Why the study?
Does sublingual nicorandil 10 mg improve coronary vasodilation and hemodynamics in patients with coronary artery disease?
Does sublingual nicorandil 10 mg improve coronary vasodilation and hemodynamics in patients with coronary artery disease?
Sublingual nicorandil produces significant coronary vasodilation and favorable hemodynamic changes in patients with coronary artery disease, supporting its use as an antianginal agent.
May support nicorandil for vasodilation in CAD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
To investigate the usefulness of nicorandil as an antianginal drug, we compared the coronary vasodilatory response in nonstenotic coronary artery segments and the hemodynamic response in 26 coronary artery disease patients. Both responses were studied prior to sublingual administration of 10 mg of this drug and 10, 30 and 60 min afterward. The plasma nicorandil concentration was determined up to 120 min after administration. The mean coronary dilating ratio of nicorandil was 117% 30 min after administration (p less than 0.01) and showed a good correlation to the plasma nicorandil concentration. The mean maximum dilating ratio of each patient was 125%. There was no difference between individual coronary arteries or between proximal and distal segments in terms of the coronary artery dilating ratio. The plasma nicorandil concentration required for 120% dilation of the coronary arteries was 26 ng/ml, 89 ng/ml and 142 ng/ml for those cases with variant angina, exertional angina and postinfarction angina, respectively. Hemodynamic changes due to administration of this drug included a decrease in blood pressure, and a reduction in total peripheral resistance, rate-pressure product, pulmonary capillary pressure and stroke-work index. These results indicate that the antianginal effects of nicorandil are derived from its coronary vasodilatory action and an inhibitory effect on myocardial oxygen consumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kishida et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: