Why the study?
The relationship between pre-infarction angina and in vivo culprit lesion characteristics evaluated by OCT in patients with a first STEMI was unknown.
Does the presence of pre-infarction angina correlate with specific culprit lesion morphologies assessed by OCT in patients with a first STEMI?
Does the presence of pre-infarction angina correlate with specific culprit lesion morphologies assessed by OCT in patients with a first STEMI?
Pre-infarction angina in first STEMI patients is associated with less plaque rupture and thin-cap fibroatheroma but more severe lumen stenosis and white thrombus on OCT.
PIA signals distinct culprit plaque stability on OCT in first STEMI; leaves open whether it refines risk stratification or therapy.
AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between pre-infarction angina (PIA) and in vivo culprit lesion characteristics as assessed by intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 305 consecutive patients with a first STEMI who underwent OCT imaging of culprit lesions during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were prospectively enrolled. OCT findings of the culprit plaque were compared between patients with (n=206) and without PIA (n=99). Patients with PIA showed lower rates of thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) (62.6% vs. 80.8%, p=0.001) and plaque rupture (56.8% vs. 72.7%, p=0.007), smaller maximum ruptured cavity areas (1.10±1.04 mm2 vs. 1.53±1.20 mm2, p=0.002), and more severe residual luminal narrowing (p=0.015) with a higher incidence of white residual thrombus (68.4% vs. 50.0%, p=0.003) at the culprit lesions than patients without PIA. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed at the one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a first STEMI, PIA was significantly associated with a lower incidence of TCFA and plaque rupture, a smaller ruptured cavity area, more white residual thrombi, and more severe lumen stenosis at the culprit lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: