Why the study?
Does initial reperfusion with low calcium improve contractile recovery and reduce calcium loading in isolated ischemic rat hearts?
Does initial reperfusion with low calcium improve contractile recovery and reduce calcium loading in isolated ischemic rat hearts?
Delayed contractile recovery after ischemia is partly due to calcium loading, which can be mitigated by low-calcium reperfusion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for low-calcium reperfusion in ischemia; leaves open clinical translation from this rat model.
Delayed recovery of contractile function after myocardial ischemia may be due to prolonged recovery of high-energy phosphates, persistent acidosis, increased inorganic phosphate, and/or calcium loading. To examine these potential mechanisms, metabolic parameters measured by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and spontaneous diastolic myofilament motion caused by sarcoplasmic reticulum-myofilament calcium cycling indexed by the scattered light intensity fluctuations (SLIF) it produces in laser beam reflected from the heart, were studied in isolated atrioventricularly blocked rat hearts (n = 10) after 65 min of ischemia at 30 degrees C. All metabolic parameters recovered to their full extent 5 min after reperfusion. Developed pressure evidenced a small recovery but then fell abruptly. This was accompanied by an increase in end diastolic pressure to 37 +/- 5 mm Hg and a fourfold increase in SLIF, to 252 +/- 58% of baseline. In another series of hearts initial reperfusion with calcium of 0.08 mM prevented the SLIF rise and resulted in improved developed pressure (74 +/- 3% vs. 39 +/- 13% of control), and lower cell calcium (5.9 +/- 3 vs. 10.3 +/- 1.4 mumol/g dry wt). Thus, during reperfusion, delayed contractile recovery is not associated with delayed recovery of pH, inorganic phosphate, or high-energy phosphates and can be attributed, in part, to an adverse effect of calcium loading which can be indexed by increased SLIF occurring at that time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiss et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: