Why the study?
Is central obesity or metabolic syndrome a better predictor of carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients?
Is central obesity or metabolic syndrome a better predictor of carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients?
In Japanese type 2 diabetic patients, the aggregation of metabolic syndrome components is a better predictor of carotid atherosclerosis than the presence of central obesity alone.
Metabolic syndrome may aid carotid atherosclerosis evaluation in Japanese T2DM beyond central obesity; leaves open prospective outcome prediction.
Metabolic syndrome has been revealed to be a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and early mortality in non-diabetic and diabetic patients. In 2005, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and the Examination Committee of Criteria for Diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome in Japan published new definitions of metabolic syndrome in which central obesity was an indispensable factor. However, the significance of this new definition to CVD in type 2 diabetes has not yet been clarified. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 294 Japanese type 2 diabetic patients without known cardiovascular disease to evaluate the association between metabolic syndrome defined by this new definition and carotid atherosclerosis, and the significance of central obesity for the prediction of the development of carotid atherosclerosis. In a multivariate regression analysis, metabolic syndrome but not central obesity was significantly associated with carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) independent of known cardiovascular risk factors (p<0.05). In addition, whereas carotid IMT was significantly increased according to the increase in the number of components of metabolic syndrome, it was not significantly different between the groups with the same number of components of metabolic syndrome with or without central obesity. These findings suggest that the prediction of the development of carotid atherosclerosis in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients could be improved by the assessment of aggregation of components of metabolic syndrome rather than with or without metabolic syndrome by this new definition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasuda et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: