Why the study?
Does combined ARB and ACEI therapy reduce myocardial fibrosis and LV stiffness compared to either therapy alone in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure?
Does combined ARB and ACEI therapy reduce myocardial fibrosis and LV stiffness compared to either therapy alone in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure?
Combined ARB and ACE inhibitor therapy prevents myocardial fibrosis and decreases LV stiffness more effectively than either agent alone in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure.
Attenuates fibrosis and LV stiffness more with ARB+ACEI than monotherapy in canine pacing HF; leaves open translation to patients.
Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACEI) each act in a different manner to prevent myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular (LV) stiffness in animals with pathways in the heart for generating ANG II as well as ACE. A model of pacing-induced congestive heart failure (CHF) was used to test the central hypothesis that ARB + ACEI prevents myocardial fibrosis and decreases LV stiffness to a greater extent than ARB or ACEI alone. Thirty-five dogs were assigned to the following treatment protocols on the 8th day of a 4-wk pacing schedule: 1) rapid ventricular pacing, 2) ARB (candesartan cilexetil, 1.5 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)) with pacing, 3) ACEI (enalapril, 1.9 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)) with pacing, 4) ARB (candesartan cilexetil, 0.75 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)) + ACEI (enalapril, 0.95 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)) with pacing, and 5) sham operation. The LV stiffness coefficient was significantly increased after rapid pacing but was significantly lower with ARB + ACEI than with ARB or ACEI alone. The collagen volume fraction and mRNA levels of collagen I and III, which were increased by rapid pacing, were significantly lower with ARB + ACEI than with ARB or ACEI alone. Thus ARB + ACEI prevents myocardial fibrosis and decreases LV stiffness during the progression of CHF compared with ARB or ACEI alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Funabiki et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: