Why the study?
Does aortic blood pressure measurement better identify target organ changes compared to brachial blood pressure categories in individuals with normal/high-normal blood pressure?
Does aortic blood pressure measurement better identify target organ changes compared to brachial blood pressure categories in individuals with normal/high-normal blood pressure?
Noninvasively determined aortic blood pressure may better identify individuals with normal/high-normal brachial blood pressure who are at risk for cardiovascular target organ damage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aortic SBP may flag subclinical organ damage missed by brachial categories in normal BP; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
AIMS: We sought to determine whether within normal/high-normal blood pressure (BP) ranges (120-139/80-89 mmHg), aortic BP may further refine BP-related cardiovascular risk assessment, as determined from target organ changes. METHODS: In 1169 participants from a community sample of African ancestry, 319 (27%) of whom had a normal/high-normal BP, aortic BP was determined using radial applanation tonometry and SphygmoCor software, and target organ changes assessed from carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) (n = 1025), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (n = 944), and left ventricular mass indexed to height (LVMI) (n = 690). RESULTS: Normal versus high-normal BP categories failed to differentiate between those participants with a BP above optimal values with versus without multivariate-adjusted target organ changes. However, in those with a normal/high-normal BP with aortic SBP values that were less than 95% confidence interval of healthy participants with optimal BP values (45% of those with a normal/high-normal BP), no unadjusted or multivariate adjusted target organ changes were noted. In contrast, those with a normal/high-normal BP with aortic SBP values that exceeded optimal thresholds, demonstrated unadjusted and multivariate adjusted increases in PWV and LVMI and decreases in eGFR (P < 0.05 to P < 0.005 after multivariate adjustments). CONCLUSION: In contrast to normal versus high-normal BP categories which do not clearly distinguish normotensives with from those without organ damage, noninvasively determined aortic BP measurements may refine the ability to detect those with a normal/high-normal BP at risk of BP-related cardiovascular damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Booysen et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: