Why the study?
Does a sequential-shock configuration with a third electrode at the right atrial septum reduce the atrial defibrillation threshold compared to the standard RAA to CS configuration in a sheep model of atrial fibrillation?
Does a sequential-shock configuration with a third electrode at the right atrial septum reduce the atrial defibrillation threshold compared to the standard RAA to CS configuration in a sheep model of atrial fibrillation?
Adding a third electrode at the right atrial septum significantly reduces the atrial defibrillation threshold compared to the standard configuration in an animal model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for multi-electrode atrial defibrillation; leaves open translation to human therapy.
BACKGROUND: The atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) energy of the standard lead configuration, right atrial appendage (RAA) to coronary sinus (CS), was reduced by >50% with the addition of a third electrode traversing the atrial septum in a previous study. This study determined whether the ADFT would be lowered by a more clinically practical third electrode placed in the right atrium along the atrial septum (RSP). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sustained atrial fibrillation was induced in 8 closed-chest sheep with burst pacing and maintained with pericardial infusion of acetyl-beta-methylcholine chloride. A custom-made, dual-defibrillation catheter was placed with electrodes in the lateral RA, CS, and RSP. A separate defibrillation catheter was also placed in the RAA. ADFT characteristics of RAA-->CS and 6 other single- or sequential-shock configurations were determined in random order by using biphasic, truncated-exponential waveforms in a multiple-reversal protocol. The delivered-energy, peak-voltage, and peak-current ADFTs for the sequential-shock configuration CS-->RSP/RA-->RSP (0.53+/-0.31 J, 86+/-22 V, and 1.6+/-0.6 A, respectively) were significantly lower than those of RAA-->CS (1.14+/-0.64 J, 157+/-34 V, and 2.5+/-1.1 A, respectively). The ADFT characteristics of RAA-->CS and RA-->CS were not significantly different, nor were those of CS-->RSP/RA-->RSP and CS-->RSP/RAA--> RSP. CONCLUSIONS: The ADFT of the standard RAA-->CS configuration may be markedly reduced with an additional electrode situated at the RSP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: