Why the study?
Doxorubicin efficacy is restricted by cardiotoxicity, and while Platycodon grandiflorum showed cardioprotective effects in early breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain elusive.
Does Platycodon grandiflorum extract prevent doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in a mouse model of breast cancer?
Does Platycodon grandiflorum extract prevent doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in a mouse model of breast cancer?
Platycodon grandiflorum extract demonstrates cardioprotective effects against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity while enhancing antimetastatic efficacy in a preclinical breast cancer model.
PG may attenuate Dox cardiotoxicity; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective RCTs before practice change.
Doxorubicin (Dox) is a first-line chemotherapeutic agent applied in cancer treatment. Its long-term anticancer efficacy is restricted mainly due to its subsequent cardiotoxicity for patients. Platycodon grandiflorum (PG), an important traditional Chinese herb, has been reported to eliminate phlegm, relieve cough, and reduce inflammatory diseases. Previous clinical studies found that PG has cardioprotective effects for early breast cancer patients who received Dox-based chemotherapy. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying PG-mediated cardiotoxic rescue remain elusive. This study aimed to explore the protective role and potential molecular mechanisms of PG on Dox-induced cardiac dysfunction in a mouse model of breast cancer. PG significantly alleviated myocardial damage and prevented cardiomyocyte apoptosis induced by Dox. The expression levels of cytochrome C and cleaved caspase-3 significantly decreased, and the levels of Bcl-XL and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2)/Bcl-2-associated X protein increased following PG treatment. Furthermore, PG remarkably enhanced the antimetastatic efficacy (versus the Dox group) by regulating the balance of matrix metalloproteinases/tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: