Why the study?
Does a high-salt diet alter cardiac AT1 and AT2 receptors in Dahl salt-sensitive rats with left ventricular hypertrophy?
Does a high-salt diet alter cardiac AT1 and AT2 receptors in Dahl salt-sensitive rats with left ventricular hypertrophy?
In Dahl salt-sensitive rats, pressure-overload left ventricular hypertrophy induced by a high-salt diet is not associated with up-regulation of cardiac AT1 and AT2 receptors, contrasting with other hypertension models.
High-salt DS rat LVH leaves cardiac AT1/AT2 density and affinity unchanged; challenges receptor upregulation as universal in hypertensive models.
Dahl Iwai salt-sensitive (DS) rats have been reported as becoming hypertensive with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and heart failure when on a high-salt diet. Their circulating renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been reported to be suppressed. To evaluate the role of angiotensin II (AngII) type 1 and type 2 receptors (AT1 and AT2, respectively) in LVH, we compared cardiac AT1 and AT2 receptors in 10-week-old DS rats and Dahl Iwai salt-resistant (DR) rats. 2. Seven pairs of 6-week-old male DS and DR rats were fed either a low- or high-salt diet (0.3 or 8% NaCl, respectively) for 4 weeks. Left ventricular AngII receptors were measured by radioligand binding assays using [125I]-[Sar1,Ile8]-AngII in plasma membrane fractions from these four groups. The AT1 and AT2 receptors were distinguished using their specific antagonists CV 11974 and PD 123319, respectively. 3. The high-salt diet increased blood pressure and the left ventricle:bodyweight ratio in DS rats. However, neither Bmax for AT1 and AT2 receptors nor Kd for [125I]-[Sar1,Ile8]-AngII differed between the groups. These results are different from those of other reports of pressure-overload LVH, such as spontaneously hypertensive rats or renovascular hypertension rats, in which AT1 and AT2 receptors were reported to be up-regulated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumida et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: