Why the study?
Does the presence of two endocardial defibrillation leads in the right ventricle cause inappropriate ICD shocks?
Does the presence of two endocardial defibrillation leads in the right ventricle cause inappropriate ICD shocks?
Leaving an abandoned endocardial defibrillation lead in the right ventricle alongside a new lead can cause oversensing and inappropriate ICD shocks due to lead interaction.
Abandoned RV defibrillation leads may cause oversensing and shocks; leaves open the prevalence and optimal management of lead interactions.
A 53-year-old male patient underwent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation with a single lead (Endotak) transvenous system due to recurrent episodes of drug refractory ventricular tachycardia. After pulse generator replacement, inappropriate ICD shocks were observed due to muscle potential sensing. Intraoperatively, the old Endotak lead could not be extracted; therefore, it was transsected and capped. A new lead was inserted and tested without any problems. At the predischarge test, VF was induced and was followed by ICD shocks during sinus rhythm. In another surgical procedure, the old Endotak lead was explanted using a special instrument. The present report demonstrates that two endocardial Endotak leads should be avoided, because the leads may disturb each other and be followed by inappropriate ICD discharges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pfitzner et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: