Why the study?
Does the ACE gene I/D polymorphism affect the blood pressure-lowering response to ACE inhibitors in Malay male hypertensive subjects?
Does the ACE gene I/D polymorphism affect the blood pressure-lowering response to ACE inhibitors in Malay male hypertensive subjects?
The DD genotype of the ACE gene is associated with a greater blood pressure-lowering response to ACE inhibitors in Malay male hypertensive patients, suggesting its potential as a genetic marker for treatment efficacy.
DD genotype may predict greater ACEI response in Malay hypertensives; leaves open its role as a pharmacogenetic marker pending validation.
INTRODUCTION: Several studies show that the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been associated with hypertension in various populations. The present study sought to determine the association of the I/D gene polymorphism among Malay male essential hypertensive subjects in response to ACE inhibitors (enalapril and lisinopril). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension and 72 healthy subjects were recruited in this study. Blood pressure was recorded from 0 to 24 weeks of treatment with enalapril or lisinopril. Genotyping of the I/D polymorphism was carried out using a standard PCR method. RESULTS: Statistically significant association of the D allele of the ACE gene was observed between the case and control subjects (p < 0.01). There was a decrease in blood pressure in the patients carrying the DD genotype (SBP=18.5±8.1 mmHg, DBP=15.29±7.1 mmHg) rather than the ID (SBP=4.1±3.3 mmHg, DBP=9.1±3.5 mmHg) and II genotypes (SBP= 3.0±0.2 mmHg, DBP 0.11±6.1 mmHg) of the ACE gene. CONCLUSION: Patients carrying the DD genotype had higher blood pressure-lowering response when treated with ACE inhibitors enalapril or lisinopril than those carrying ID and II genotypes, suggesting that the D allele may be a possible genetic marker for essential hypertension among Malay male subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heidari et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: