Why the study?
Does elevation of great cardiac vein pressure affect coronary flow and pressure-flow relations under different vasomotor tone conditions in isolated canine hearts?
Does elevation of great cardiac vein pressure affect coronary flow and pressure-flow relations under different vasomotor tone conditions in isolated canine hearts?
The threshold pressure for altering coronary vascular waterfall behavior is dependent on vascular tone and mechanical activity.
Tone-dependent PGCV threshold in canine hearts; leaves open relevance to human coronary flow regulation.
We examined the "vascular waterfall" hypothesis, which proposes that coronary flow is unaffected by elevations in outflow pressure until the latter reaches a critical threshold level, in 29 isolated canine hearts. In fibrillating hearts vasodilated with adenosine or carbocromen, coronary flow and the coronary pressure-flow relation were not affected by changes in great cardiac vein pressure (PGCV) below a threshold value of 11 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SEM) mm Hg. Further elevations of PGCV reduced flow and shifted the pressure-flow relation to the right, increasing its pressure-axis intercept (Pf=0). When vasomotor tone was augmented with vasopressin, threshold PGCV increased to 25 +/- 2.7 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). Once again, the pressure-flow relation was unaffected by changes in PGCV below the threshold value and shifted to the right when this value was exceeded. The amount by which spontaneous values of Pf=0 exceeded threshold values of PGCV was greater when vasomotor tone was augmented than during vasodilation. Pf=0 continued to exceed PGCV when the latter was raised above the threshold level. Both Pf=0 and threshold values of PGCV were less during a long diastole than during ventricular fibrillation. We reached the following conclusions. 1) During changes in PGCV below a threshold value, the coronary circulation exhibits traditional waterfall behavior. 2) The threshold pressure for altering waterfall behavior is affected by vascular tone and mechanical activity. 3) Pf=0 remains above PGCV when the latter is increased above the threshold value needed to alter flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farhi et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: