Why the study?
Do electrophysiological tests of autonomic function accurately distinguish patients with idiopathic autonomic failure syndromes from normal subjects and differentiate between MSA and PAF?
Do electrophysiological tests of autonomic function accurately distinguish patients with idiopathic autonomic failure syndromes from normal subjects and differentiate between MSA and PAF?
Electrophysiological tests of autonomic function are highly sensitive and specific for distinguishing patients with autonomic failure from normal subjects, but are less effective at differentiating between multiple system atrophy and pure autonomic failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combined autonomic tests may identify failure versus normal; leaves open reliable MSA-PAF differentiation in prospective studies.
Three electrophysiological tests of autonomic function were performed in patients with autonomic nervous system dysfunction to define test sensitivities and specificities. The skin sympathetic response, Valsalva ratio, and heart rate variation with deep breathing were studied in 10 patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and in 7 patients with pure (also called progressive or primary) autonomic failure (PAF); control subjects were 17 normal individuals of similar age. Thirteen patients had abnormal skin sympathetic responses, and 16 had abnormal Valsalva ratios. Fourteen patients had an abnormal variation of the heart rate with deep breathing. Taking the three tests together, binary logistic regression for distinguishing between patients and normal subjects correctly classified 91% of the 33 individuals for whom there were complete data with sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 94%. However, only 69% of the patients could be correctly classified by a logistic regression for discriminating between MSA and PAF. Electromyography (EMG) studies showed that 7 of 8 patients with MSA but only 2 of 7 patients with PAF (both multiparous women) had denervation of the rectal sphincter muscle. The EMG study is, therefore, valuable in men, but has a high false positive rate in women, probably because of pudendal nerve injury from parturition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravits et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: