Why the study?
Does Amplicor RT-PCR improve the detection of enterovirus compared to routine cell culture in cerebrospinal fluid specimens?
Does Amplicor RT-PCR improve the detection of enterovirus compared to routine cell culture in cerebrospinal fluid specimens?
Amplicor RT-PCR is a highly sensitive and specific tool for diagnosing enteroviral meningitis compared to traditional cell culture.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid enteroviral meningitis diagnosis in CSF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and routine cell culture for the detection of enterovirus in cerebrospinal fluid. METHODS: Thirty-eight cerebrospinal fluid specimens were included. Cell culture was inoculated immediately and incubated for 14 days. An aliquot was kept frozen for Amplicor RT-PCR. Chart review was performed to determine the validity of the results. RESULTS: Nine of 38 specimens were positive for enterovirus by culture, and 14 were positive by RT-PCR. There were 7 discrepancies between the 2 methods. Six specimens were positive by RT-PCR and negative by the culture method. The 1 culture-positive but RT-PCR--negative specimen was determined to contain PCR inhibitors. All discrepant results were confirmed as true positives by chart review. Patients whose cerebrospinal fluid was negative by both methods had a final diagnosis other than enterovirus infection. CONCLUSION: Amplicor PCR is more sensitive than cell culture (93.3% vs. 60%) and is very specific. With the incorporation of appropriate controls for the detection of amplification inhibitors, RT-PCR could be a valuable tool in the diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hadziyannis et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: