Why the study?
The SMART-QT smartphone application was developed to semi-automatically measure QT and QTc intervals from monitor ECG snapshots, but required validation.
Does the SMART-QT smartphone application accurately measure QT and QTc intervals compared to manual 12-lead ECG measurement in adults without cardiac comorbidities?
Does the SMART-QT smartphone application accurately measure QT and QTc intervals compared to manual 12-lead ECG measurement in adults without cardiac comorbidities?
A novel smartphone application can semi-automatically and accurately measure QT and QTc intervals from patient monitor snapshots in patients without cardiac comorbidities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Facilitates rapid QTc assessment via smartphone; leaves open accuracy across ECG morphologies before clinical adoption.
We developed a smartphone application (SMART-QT application) that can semi-automatically measure QT and QTc intervals based on a snapshot of the electrocardiogram (ECG) trace and the heart rate displayed on a patient monitor. In this study, we aimed to validate the SMART-QT application. In this prospective single-center method comparison study, we measured QT and QTc intervals with the SMART-QT application (QT APP and QTc APP ; test method) and simultaneously manually measured QT and QTc intervals from a 12-lead ECG (QT REF and QTc REF ; reference method) in 57 adult volunteers and patients who had sinus rhythm and no acute or chronic cardiac comorbidities. To investigate the agreement between QT APP and QT REF and between QTc APP and QTc REF , we performed Bland-Altman analyses and calculated the mean of the differences, the standard deviation, and the 95%-limits of agreement (95%-LOA). We defined clinically acceptable agreement as maximum mean of the differences ± standard deviation of 20 ± 20 ms. The mean of the differences between QT APP and QT REF was 14 ± 20 ms (95%-LOA −26 to 54 ms). The mean of the differences between QTc APP and QTc REF was 13 ± 15 ms (95%-LOA −16 to 42 ms). The agreement between QT APP and QT REF and between QTc APP and QTc REF was clinically acceptable in adult volunteers and patients without cardiac comorbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beckmann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: