Why the study?
What is the incidence of hyposideraemia and haemolysis in patients following heart valve replacement with Lillehei-Kaster or Starr-Edwards prostheses?
What is the incidence of hyposideraemia and haemolysis in patients following heart valve replacement with Lillehei-Kaster or Starr-Edwards prostheses?
Intravascular haemolysis and resulting iron deficiency are common after mechanical valve replacement, suggesting a need for routine serum iron monitoring and supplementation when indicated.
Supports monitoring for haemolysis and iron deficiency after mechanical valves; leaves open whether supplementation improves outcomes.
The haematological status was evaluated in 128 consecutive patients 3 to 24 months after aortic and/or mitral valve replacement with Starr-Edwards' or Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. Anaemia was present in 2%, and hyposideraemia in 20%. The incidence of compensated intravascular haemolysis was very high, subnormal serum haptoglobin being present in 80% of the patients, and serum LDH elevated in 91%. The hyposideraemia was associated with a significant decrease of haemoglobin concentration, haematocrit, mean corpuscular haemoglobin content and mean corpuscular volume, while serum transferrin concentration was elevated. These findings indicate that the hyposideraemia is caused by a true iron deficiency, which can be ascribed to the increased urinary iron loss associated with intravascular haemolysis. The degree of haemolysis appeared to be higher in patients with Starr-Edwards prostheses than in subjects with Lillehei-Raster prostheses, and was more pronounced in patients with double valves than in subjects with single valves. Oral iron therapy induced a significant rise of serum iron and haemoglobin concentrations in hyposideraemic patients. It is suggested that the follow-up of patients submitted to valvular replacement should include a measurement of serum iron concentration within the two years after operation and that iron therapy should be started in the event of hyposideraemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersen et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: