Key result
SMART1Map yielded more accurate T1 measurements than MOLLI in phantom experiments, with average T1 errors of 0.9±3.4% versus -4.8±13.3%.
Population
A phantom composed of a range of T1s and T1/T2 ratios
Comparison
SMART1Map vs MOLLI and corrected MOLLI
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Phantom data favor SMART1Map for T1 accuracy; leaves open translation to clinical cardiac imaging.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.9% vs -4.8%
SMART1Map provides more accurate and consistent true T1 measurements compared to MOLLI in phantom experiments, independent of heart rate and readout window duration.
Slavin et al. (2013) studied Cardiac T1 mapping (phantom study). SMART1Map vs. MOLLI was evaluated on Average T1 errors over all measurements. SMART1Map yielded more accurate T1 measurements than MOLLI in phantom experiments, with average T1 errors of 0.9±3.4% versus -4.8±13.3%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: