Why the study?
Due to the abundance of enterovirus infections, distinguishing between on-going and previous infections using immunological assays is difficult unless the IgM fraction is studied.
Does the IgG antibody response against enterovirus proteases 2A and 3C accurately identify acute enterovirus infection?
Does the IgG antibody response against enterovirus proteases 2A and 3C accurately identify acute enterovirus infection?
Antibody responses against enterovirus proteases 2A and 3C are short-lived and can serve as accurate markers for acute enterovirus infection.
Should not yet change enterovirus diagnostics; leaves open need for prospective clinical validation.
Background: Enteroviruses are a group of common non-enveloped RNA viruses that cause symptoms ranging from mild respiratory infections to paralysis. Due to the abundance of enterovirus infections it is hard to distinguish between on-going and previous infections using immunological assays unless the IgM fraction is studied. Methods: In this study we show using Indirect ELISA and capture IgM ELISA that an IgG antibody response against the nonstructural enteroviral proteins 2A and 3C can be used to distinguish between IgM positive (n = 22) and IgM negative (n = 20) human patients with 83% accuracy and a diagnostic odds ratio of 30. Using a mouse model, we establish that the antibody response to the proteases is short-lived compared to the antibody response to the structural proteins in. As such, the protease antibody response serves as a potential marker for an acute infection. Conclusions: Antibody responses against enterovirus proteases are shorter-lived than against structural proteins and can differentiate between IgM positive and negative patients, and therefore they are a potential marker for acute infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saarinen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: