Some experiments are described in which a counter-spectrometer method is compared with an X-ray photographic method as a means of determining the integrated reflexion of a number of reflexions. The advantages and limitations of the photographic, ionization and counter-spectrometers are discussed, and it is concluded that for long exposures the photographic spectrometer is as sensitive as the counter-spectrometer used for a few minutes and more sensitive than the ionization spectrometer. For convenience and speed of measurement the counter-spectrometer is probably the best instrument.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wooster et al. (1948) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: