Why the study?
Methods assessing flow-dependent vasodilation and acetylcholine-induced vasodilation are widely used but have not been introduced into everyday clinical practice.
Does acetylcholine iontophoresis with high-frequency ultrasound provide a more reproducible assessment of endothelial dysfunction compared to flow-dependent vasodilation of the brachial artery in patients with type II diabetes mellitus?
Does acetylcholine iontophoresis with high-frequency ultrasound provide a more reproducible assessment of endothelial dysfunction compared to flow-dependent vasodilation of the brachial artery in patients with type II diabetes mellitus?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acetylcholine iontophoresis in the microvasculature is a more accurate and reproducible non-invasive method for detecting endothelial dysfunction in diabetic patients compared to standard brachial artery flow-mediated dilation.
Introduction . The method for assessing the flow-dependent vasodilation (FDV) and vasodilation induced by local iontophoresis of acetylcholine (Ach) is widely used, but has not yet been introduced into everyday clinical practice. Aim . Comparison of 2 ultrasound methods for assessing endothelial function in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Materials and methods . Effectiveness of reactive hyperemia tests of the brachial artery was compared using Vivid7pro ultrasound device, GE, with transducer 7.5 MHz. and the endothelium-dependent vasodilation and Ach iontophoresis in the microvasculature of the forearm were evaluated using a Minimax-Doppler-K ultrasound device with a 25 MHz transducer. After iontophoresis Ach, the linear blood flow velocity (%) was measured in comparison with the initial velocity. FDV is expressed as a % increase in arterial diameter in response to the test performed. Results . % of increase in blood flow velocity in the DM group was less than that in the control group for 2–6 minutes after the test and varied from 105.35 to 119.11 % in the DM group and from 130.0 to 270.0 % in healthy control subjects (p<0.05 for 2–6 min). After occlusion of the artery in reactive hyperemia test, as well as after 20, 40, and 180 sec, patients with DM had a lower % of increase in the diameter of the vessel, compared with healthy control subjects. When performing Celermaer test in 7 patients (43.75 %), in a number of measurements, an increase in the diameter of the vessel of more than 10 % was observed (which is characteristic of healthy control subjects). Conclusion . We associated the poor reproducibility of reactive hyperemia of the brachial artery with the difficulty in interpreting the results, which is probably due to the real-time resolution of the ultrasound method, and the Doppler method for assessing the linear blood flow velocity in the microvasculature turned to be less operator-dependent and more reproducible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Малахова et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: