Why the study?
The risk of vessel-oriented cardiac adverse events in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing intracoronary physiology-guided coronary revascularization was poorly defined.
Does diabetes mellitus (specifically IDDM vs NIDDM) increase the risk of vessel-oriented cardiac adverse events in patients undergoing intracoronary physiology-guided coronary revascularization?
Does diabetes mellitus (specifically IDDM vs NIDDM) increase the risk of vessel-oriented cardiac adverse events in patients undergoing intracoronary physiology-guided coronary revascularization?
In patients undergoing physiology-guided coronary revascularization, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (but not non-insulin-dependent diabetes) is associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse cardiac events, particularly when intervention is deferred.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DM not linked to higher VOCE after physiology-guided PCI; supports deferral in diabetics but leaves open need for prospective trials.
OBJECTIVE: The risk of vessel-oriented cardiac adverse events (VOCE) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing intracoronary physiology-guided coronary revascularization is poorly defined. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the risk of VOCE in patients with and without DM in whom percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed or deferred based on pressure-wire functional assessment. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry of patients evaluated with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or non-hyperaemic pressure ratio (NHPR). Primary endpoint was a composite of VOCE including cardiac death, vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR). RESULTS: A large cohort of 2828 patients with 3353 coronary lesions was analysed to assess the risk of VOCE at long-term follow-up (23 [14-36] months). Non-insulin-dependent-DM (NIDDM) was not associated with the primary endpoint in the overall cohort (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.87-1.59, P = 0.276) or in patients with coronary lesions treated with PCI (aHR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.78-2.16, P = 0.314). Conversely, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) demonstrated an increased risk of VOCE in the overall cohort (aHR 1.76, 95% CI 1.07-2.91, P = 0.027), but not in coronary lesions undergoing PCI (aHR 1.26, 95% CI 0.50-3.16, P = 0.621). Importantly, in coronary lesions deferred after functional assessment IDDM (aHR 2.77, 95% CI 1.11-6.93, P = 0.029) but not NIDDM (aHR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.61-1.44, P = 0.776) was significantly associated with the risk of VOCE. IDDM caused a significant effect modification of FFR-based risk stratification (P for interaction < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall, DM was not associated with an increased risk of VOCE in patients undergoing physiology-guided coronary revascularization. However, IDDM represents a phenotype at high risk of VOCE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scarsini et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: