January 1, 2003Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Atrial Septal Versus Atrial Appendage Pacing:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

Does atrial septal pacing improve atrial conduction and synchronization compared to atrial appendage pacing?

Population

56 patients requiring atrial pacing (n=28 per group)

Comparison

Atrial septal pacing (Se-P) vs Atrial appendage pacing (Ap-P)

Design

RCT, randomized

Authors

JHJean‐Sylvain HermidaInserm CCChristophe CarpentierUniversité Paris-Saclay MKMaciej KubalaElectrophysiology

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Supports septal over appendage pacing to preserve atrial synchrony; extends RCT evidence for site-specific atrial pacing.

Structured PICO

Does atrial septal pacing improve atrial conduction and synchronization compared to atrial appendage pacing?

Population

56 patients requiring atrial pacing (n=28 per group)

Intervention

Atrial septal pacing (Se-P)

Comparator

Atrial appendage pacing (Ap-P)

Outcome

Feasibility, reliability, and effects on atrial conduction, interatrial synchronization, and the AV sequencesurrogate

Atrial septal pacing avoids the undesirable prolongation of atrial, interatrial, and AV conductions observed during atrial appendage pacing.

Cite This Study

Hermida et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7263f331a3df82432a1594 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00146.x

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Atrial Septal Versus Atrial Appendage Pacing:

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Atrial Septal Versus Atrial Appendage Pacing:

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider