Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Valverde (1988) claims that the general public and many educators believe it is extremely difficult if not impossible simultaneously to provide excellent education to majority youngsters and to provide equality of opportunity to ethnic and racial minority students. We explore the paradox these two major goals present, namely that schools should promote both equality and quality but cannot foster both goals at once. We argue that the apparent antithesis of equality and quality results from mutually exclusive definitions obscuring the true relationship between the two constructs. In place of these definitions, we offer a model demonstrating that equality and quality are not only compatible but mutually supportive and enhancing. Selon Valverde (1988), le public et de nombreux educateurs estiment qu’il est tres difficile, sinon impossible, d’offrir a la fois une excellente education a une majorite de jeunes et l’egalite des chances aux eleves des minorites ethniques ou raciales. Dans cet article, les auteurs analysent le paradoxe qui resulte de ces deux objectifs cles, paradoxe qui se formule comme suit: l’ecole devrait promouvoir l’egalite et la qualite, mais il lui serait impossible de realiser les deux a la fois. Les auteurs avancent que l’opposition apparente entre l’egalite et la qualite resulte de definitions mutuellement exclusives qui embrouillent le lien veritable entre les deux visees educatives. En place et lieu de ces definitions, les auteurs proposent un modele demontrant que l’egalite et la qualite sont non seulement compatibles, mais complementaires et mutuellement enrichissants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: