Why the study?
Does enalaprilat affect endothelium-dependent relaxations and angiotensin I contractions differently in human internal mammary arteries versus saphenous veins?
Does enalaprilat affect endothelium-dependent relaxations and angiotensin I contractions differently in human internal mammary arteries versus saphenous veins?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ACE inhibition with enalaprilat has differential effects on human arteries and veins, inactivating bradykinin and converting Ang I to Ang II in the saphenous vein but not the internal mammary artery.
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) participates in the regulation of vascular tone; its effects were studied in human internal mammary artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV) suspended in organ chambers for isometric tension recording. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalaprilat (10(-7) M) markedly augmented endothelium-dependent relaxations to bradykinin in SV (concentration shift: 10-fold; n = 6; p < 0.005), but not in IMA; in both blood vessels, it had no effect on endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine. The contractions to angiotensin I (Ang I; 10(-7) M) were markedly inhibited by enalaprilat (10(-7) M) in SV (control: 34 +/- 6% of 100 mM KCl; treatment: 18 +/- 6%; n = 7; p < 0.05) but not in IMA (control: 33 +/- 4%; treatment: 30 +/- 6%; n = 7; NS) and abolished by the Ang II receptor antagonist DuP 753 (10(-7) M) in both blood vessels. Ang II (10(-7) M) induced more pronounced contractions than Ang I in IMA (63 +/- 4%) and SV (63 +/- 5%; n = 5-6; p < 0.05 vs. Ang I), which was markedly inhibited by DuP 753 (10(-7) M; IMA: 21 +/- 5%; SV: 32 +/- 5%; p < 0.05). Thus, in SV but not IMA, ACE inactivates bradykinin and thereby blunts endothelium-dependent relaxations to the peptide and converts Ang I to Ang II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: