Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
The author suggests that trials on thrombus aspiration should compare PCI alone with thrombectomy performed at the discretion of an experienced operator, rather than a binary approach.
_To the Editor:_ A typical feature of recent trials on thrombus aspiration is the binary approach, with either thrombectomy or standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) considered to be applicable to every patient. In an ideal trial, PCI alone would be compared with thrombectomy performed at the discretion of an experienced operator. The success of thrombus aspiration (an interventional action) is largely dependent on the skill of the individual operator, and data on the effectiveness of the procedure (e.g., histologic analysis of retrieved material) should ideally be reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jolly et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: