Why the study?
Does time-to-peak diameter during flow-mediated dilation better discriminate individuals with metabolic syndrome from healthy subjects compared to traditional FMD?
Does time-to-peak diameter during flow-mediated dilation better discriminate individuals with metabolic syndrome from healthy subjects compared to traditional FMD?
Time-to-peak diameter during flow-mediated dilation is a more sensitive marker of vascular dysfunction in metabolic syndrome than traditional FMD.
May improve vascular dysfunction detection in metabolic syndrome; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Inconsistent evidences of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) impact on vascular reactivity raise questions on flow-mediated dilation (FMD) discriminatory power for disturbances induced by this clustering of risk factors. Previous reports, however, suggest that covariates such as the follow-up of the artery diameter changes, the arterial size and shear stress affect FMD responses and consequently its discriminatory power for distinctive clinical profiles. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of MetS on traditional, arterial size- and shear-rate-adjusted FMD, the follow-up-derived time-to-peak diameter (TP), as well as their power for discriminating subjects with this clustering of risk factors from a sample of healthy individuals. METHODS: Twenty-one MetS and ten healthy subjects underwent an assessment of endothelial function via FMD. RESULTS: Traditional and allometrically scaled FMD did not differ between groups (P>0·05) as well as the approach in which the covariate was the peak diameter shear rate. In the existence of MetS, TP was longer (67·7 ± 16·4 s versus healthy 42·1 ± 16·3 s, P = 0·001). ROC curve analysis indicated that TP (AUC = 0·871 [95% CI, 0·718-1·000]) had greater power of discrimination for MetS than FMD approaches. In addition, TP presented a moderate and significant association with sE-selectin (r = 0·458, P = 0·048). CONCLUSION: Time-to-peak diameter (TP) rather than FMD distinguished MetS from a healthy profile. Therefore, at least in subjects with MetS, TP may provide insights into the impact of this clustering of risk factors on the vascular phenotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernandes et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: