Key result
Metabolic syndrome is linked to ~6-point lower flow-mediated dilation regardless of obesity status.
Why the study?
Data suggest metabolic health status incorporating metabolic syndrome components predicts cardiovascular disease risk better than BMI, prompting exploration of how metabolic syndrome and obesity associate with endothelial function.
Does metabolic syndrome reduce endothelial function in adults independent of their obesity status?
Cross-Sectional (n=44)
No
Does metabolic syndrome reduce endothelial function in adults independent of their obesity status?
Mean Difference: 6.2 (95% CI 3.1–9.2)
p-value: p=<0.001
Components of metabolic syndrome, rather than obesity itself, are the primary drivers of reduced flow-mediated dilation and endothelial dysfunction.
Metabolic syndrome components may drive endothelial impairment beyond obesity; leaves open prospective confirmation and intervention effects.
BACKGROUND: Data suggest that metabolic health status, incorporating components of metabolic syndrome (MetS), predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk better than BMI. This study explored the association of MetS and obesity with endothelial function, a prognostic risk factor for incident CVD. METHODS: Forty-four participants were phenotyped according to BMI as non-obese vs obese (<30 or >30 kg/m2) and according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria of MetS: ≤2 criteria MetS (MetS-) vs ≥3 criteria MetS (MetS+); (1.)non-obese MetS- vs (2.) non-obese MetS+ and (3.) obese MetS- vs (4.) obese MetS+. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD), body composition including liver fat (MRI and spectroscopy), dietary intake, intensities of habitual physical activity and cardio-respiratory fitness were determined. Variables were analysed using a one-factor between-groups ANOVA and linear regression; mean (95% CI) are presented. RESULTS: Individuals with MetS+ displayed lower FMD than those with MetS-. For non-obese individuals mean difference between MetS+ and MetS- was 4.1% ((1.0, 7.3); P = 0.004) and obese individuals had a mean difference between MetS+ and MetS- of 6.2% ((3.1, 9.2); P < 0.001). Although there was no association between BMI and FMD (P = 0.27), an increased number of MetS components was associated with a lower FMD (P = 0.005), and after adjustment for age and sex, 19.7% of the variance of FMD was explained by MetS, whereas only 1.1% was explained by BMI. CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, components of MetS, rather than obesity per se, contribute to reduced FMD, which suggests a reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide and thus increased risk of CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sprung et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic syndrome and obesity (n=44). Metabolic syndrome (MetS+) vs. Without metabolic syndrome (MetS-) was evaluated on Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (Mean difference 6.2% in FMD between obese MetS+ and obese MetS-, 95% CI 3.1-9.2, p=<0.001). Metabolic syndrome was associated with significantly reduced flow-mediated dilation irrespective of obesity, showing a mean impairment difference of 6.2% in obese (p<0.001) and 4.1% in non-obese participants (p=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: