I find considerable evidence that wildlife management has broken partially free of its roots and is show- ing signs of malnourishment. It also is beset with various ailments, including addiction to technology, lust for sta- tistics, professional hubris, and the delusion that research and management are synonymous. The wildlife man- agement discipline started as applied natural history, and most of its star practitioners were broad-based naturalists, intimate with the landscapes and organisms in their charge. There are reasons to believe that the wildlife profes- sion would do well to regraft itself to those natural history roots, especially in view of the changing roles that will be manifest as this century comes of age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven G. Herman (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: