Why the study?
Can auto-regressive moving-average (ARMA) analysis accurately determine arterial baroreflex gain during spontaneous breathing compared to the spontaneous sequence method?
Can auto-regressive moving-average (ARMA) analysis accurately determine arterial baroreflex gain during spontaneous breathing compared to the spontaneous sequence method?
ARMA-derived baroreflex gain values are reproducible and can be determined during spontaneous breathing, making the method suitable for broader clinical use.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ARMA for spontaneous-breathing baroreflex gain assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The heart rate component of the arterial baroreflex gain (BRG) was determined with auto-regressive moving-average (ARMA) analysis during each of spontaneous (SB) and random breathing (RB) protocols. Ten healthy subjects completed each breathing pattern on two different days in each of two different body positions, supine (SUP) and head-up tilt (HUT). The R-R interval, systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and instantaneous lung volume were recorded continuously. BRG was estimated from the ARMA impulse response relationship of R-R interval to SAP and from the spontaneous sequence method. The results indicated that both the ARMA and spontaneous sequence methods were reproducible (r = 0.76 and r = 0.85, respectively). As expected, BRG was significantly less in the HUT compared to SUP position for both ARMA (mean +/- SEM; 3.5 +/- 0.3 versus 11.2 +/- 1.4 ms mmHg-1; P < 0.01) and spontaneous sequence analysis (10.3 +/- 0.8 versus 31.5 +/- 2.3 ms mmHg-1; P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between BRG during RB and SB protocols for either ARMA (7.9 +/- 1.4 versus 6.7 +/- 0.8 ms mmHg-1; P = 0.27) or spontaneous sequence methods (21.8 +/- 2.7 versus 20.0 +/- 2.1 ms mmHg-1; P = 0.24). BRG was correlated during RB and SB protocols (r = 0.80; P < 0.0001). ARMA and spontaneous BRG estimates were correlated (r = 0.79; P < 0.0001), with spontaneous sequence values being consistently larger (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, we have shown that ARMA-derived BRG values are reproducible and that they can be determined during SB conditions, making the ARMA method appropriate for use in a wider range of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Leary et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: