Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study to assess the efficacy and the safety of repeated dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex ® ) in vascular macular edema in real-life practice. Materials and Methods: This was a 22-month prospective study, including eyes with vascular macular edema according to the inclusion criteria. Baseline and follow-up visits included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundoscopy, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and central macular thickness (CMT) measurement with optical coherence tomography. Main outcomes included changes in BCVA and CMT at the 1 st , 2 nd , 4 th , and 6 th months; time to retreatment; and incidence of side effects. Results: A total of 31 eyes of 24 patients were included in the present study. After the first intravitreal injection, BCVA (baseline 0.940 ± 0.463 LogMAR) improved significantly to 0.483 ± 0.323 LogMAR at 2 nd month ( P = 0.000), 0.657 ± 0.357 at 4 th month ( P = 0.000), and 0.690 ± 0,448 at 6 th month ( P = 0.001). Mean CMT (baseline = 582.51 ± 148.20) decreased statistically significantly at 2 nd month and 4 th month after the first intravitreal injection (245.87 ± 103.86 and 456.68 ± 182.735, respectively, both P < 0.001 vs. baseline). At the 6 th month, CMT was 407.93 ± 212.70 for the 16 eyes that had not been reinjected versus baseline CMT 576.93 ± 158.56 ( P = 0.008). After other Ozurdex ® injections, we had the same visual acuity gain and CMT reduction, an average of 2.03 ± 0.83 injections were done. The most common side effects were cataract development and rise in IOP. Conclusion: Ozurdex ® implant is an effective treatment for vascular macular edema with a good safety profile; however, its effectiveness seems to decrease with time requiring repeated injections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdellaoui et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: