Why the study?
While pacemaker reuse is well established, the safety of reusing implantable cardioverter-defibrillators regarding functionality and infection rates had not been properly investigated.
Does the use of resterilized, reused ICDs increase the rate of complications compared to new ICDs in patients with class I indications?
Population
271 patients with class I indication for ICD implantation in Romania
Design
Retrospective case-control study
Authors
Loading...
Supports consideration of verified resterilized ICDs where new devices unavailable; leaves open need for prospective trials before broader adoption.
Does the use of resterilized, reused ICDs increase the rate of complications compared to new ICDs in patients with class I indications?
Properly verified and resterilized ICDs appear to be as safe as new devices regarding infection and malfunction rates, offering a safe and cost-effective alternative in resource-limited settings.
Enache et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: