Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study demonstrates a low 2.8% mortality rate under standardized intensive care for adult tetanus, suggesting favorable outcomes despite frequent infections.
<ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Background:</ns3:bold> Tetanus remains common in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) yet the evidence base guiding management of this disease is extremely limited, particularly with respect to contemporary management options. Sharing knowledge about practice may facilitate improvement in outcomes elsewhere. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Methods</ns3:bold> : We describe clinical interventions and outcomes of 180 adult patients ≥16 years-old with tetanus enrolled in prospective observational studies at a specialist infectious diseases hospital in Southern Vietnam. Patients were treated according to a holistic management protocol encompassing wound-care, antitoxin, antibiotics, symptom control, airway management, nutrition and de-escalation criteria. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Results</ns3:bold> : Mortality rate in our cohort was 2.8%, with 90 (50%) patients requiring mechanical ventilation for a median 16 [IQR 12-24] days. Median [IQR] duration of ICU stay was 15 [8-23] days. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction occurred in 45 (25%) patients. Hospital acquired infections occurred in 77 (43%) of patients. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Conclusion</ns3:bold> : We report favourable outcomes for patients with tetanus in a single centre LMIC ICU, treated according to a holistic protocol. Nevertheless, many patients required prolonged intensive care support and hospital acquired infections were common. </ns3:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hảo et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: