Why the study?
Are serum troponin T and I levels reliable markers for detecting cardiac transplant rejection in heart transplant recipients?
Are serum troponin T and I levels reliable markers for detecting cardiac transplant rejection in heart transplant recipients?
Troponin T and I levels do not correlate with biopsy-proven cardiac transplant rejection, indicating they are not useful as non-invasive screening markers for this purpose.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Troponin levels should not guide rejection surveillance; leaves open validation of alternative non-invasive markers in prospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: Heart transplant recipients undergo a number of invasive endomyocardial biopsies to screen for rejection. Serum assays of troponin T and/or I may provide a less invasive alternative. The purpose of this study was to evaluate troponin T and I as markers of cardiac transplant rejection. METHODS: We conducted a prospective analysis comparing troponin T and I levels to biopsy results in heart transplant recipients. Plasma was assayed for troponin T and I preoperatively, on the first 3 postoperative days, and with each subsequent biopsy. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients entered the study. A total of 173 biopsies were performed at a mean follow-up of 129+/-9 days (range: 12-564 days). There were two rejection episodes (> or = grade 3), one in each of two patients. There were no significant relationships between troponin T or I and biopsy-proven rejection (> or = grade 3; P=0.59 and 0.54, respectively). There were also no correlations between troponin T or I levels and biopsy grade (P=0.40 and 0.92, respectively). Troponin T and I levels peaked on postoperative day 1 and fell to baseline over long-term follow-up with no peak in serum markers associated with rejection episodes. Donor ischemic time was significantly correlated to troponin T on postoperative days 1-3 (r=0.58, P=0.005; r=0.61, P=0.004; and r=0.61, P=0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Troponin T and I are not useful indicators of cardiac rejection, but do correlate with donor heart ischemic injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mullen et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: