Why the study?
SYNTAX and clinical SYNTAX scores predict MACE after PCI, but the study sought to investigate their prognostic values with more accurate predictive ability.
Do SYNTAX and clinical SYNTAX scores predict MACE in patients with ACS undergoing primary PCI?
Do SYNTAX and clinical SYNTAX scores predict MACE in patients with ACS undergoing primary PCI?
SYNTAX and clinical SYNTAX scores are useful for predicting 12-month MACE in patients with ACS undergoing primary PCI.
May enhance MACE prediction in ACS; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation before practice change.
Background: SYNTAX (SS) and clinical SYNTAX (CSS) scores are widely used in clinical practice to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after elective and primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). We sought to investigate prognostic values for SS and CSS with more accurate predictive ability for MACE. Methods: All patients of two referral hospitals who were diagnosed with ACS were recruited for the study. SS and CSS were calculated by researchers blinded to the operators using the designed web-based software and clinical factors. SS was classified into three categories: low SS1:0 – 11.75, moderate SS2:11.75 – 23.25, and high SS3: ≥ 23.25. CSS was classified as follows: low CSS1:0-22.95, moderate CSS2:22.95-35.95, and high CSS3: ≥ 35.95. All patients were advised to visit our clinic at 1, 6, and 12 months. Clinical examination results and MACE were recorded in the hospital clinical system database. Results: We recorded the clinical data of 296 patients. After 12 months of follow-up, MACE occurred in 16.8% of SS3, 9.3% of SS2, and 8.2% of SS1 cases. MACE accounted for 14.0% of CSS3, 11.3% of CSS2, and 8.1% of CSS1 cases. Conclusions: The classification of SS (low SS1:0 – 11.75, moderate SS2:11.75 – 23.25, high SS3: ≥ 23.25) and CCS (low CSS1:0-22.95, moderate CSS2:22.95-35.95, high CSS3: ≥ 35.95) had important roles in the risk assessment of patients with ACS who underwent primary PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Do Van Chien (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: