Key result
The GeneXpert EV assay demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for enteroviral meningitis, yielding a pooled sensitivity of 0.96, a pooled specificity of 0.99, and a diagnostic odds ratio of 3648.23.
Why the study?
There was a lack of research evaluating the performance of the GeneXpert enterovirus assay for diagnosing enterovirus meningitis.
Does the GeneXpert enterovirus assay accurately diagnose enterovirus meningitis compared to RT-PCR?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,890)
Does the GeneXpert enterovirus assay accurately diagnose enterovirus meningitis compared to RT-PCR?
Odds Ratio: 3648.23 (95% CI 963.99–13806.72)
The GeneXpert enterovirus assay demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 0.96, specificity 0.99) for the rapid diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis compared to RT-PCR.
May support GeneXpert EV adoption for enteroviral meningitis diagnosis; extends pooled accuracy data but leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: GeneXpert enterovirus Assay is a PCR-based assay for Enterovirus meningitis diagnosis. However, there is currently no research about the performance of GeneXpert enterovirus assay in the diagnosis of enterovirus meningitis. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis is significant on the topic. METHODS: Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PubMed were systematically reviewed with retrieval types. Some criteria were used to filter the studies. Only studies published in English, that made a comparison between GeneXpert enterovirus assay and RT-PCR, and could be formulated in a 2*2 table, were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated by QUADAS-2. The effect of the GeneXpert enterovirus assay was assessed by the Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Likelihood Ratio, Negative Likelihood Ratio, Diagnosis Odds Ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Publication bias and heterogeneity were evaluated by the Deeks' funnel test and Bivariate Box plot respectively. RESULTS: 7 studies were recruited in the analysis. The Pooled Sensitivity was 0.96 [95% CI (0.94-0.97)], Pooled Specificity was 0.99 [95% CI (0.98-0.99)], Positive Likelihood Ratio was 130.46 [95% CI (35.79-475.58)], Negative Likelihood Ratio was 0.04 [95% CI (0.02-0.10)], and Diagnostic Odds Ratio was 3648.23 (95% CI [963.99-13,806.72)]. In SROC Curve, Area Under Curve (AUC) was 0.9980, and Q*= 0.9849. In Deeks' funnel test, the P-value was 0.807 (P > 0.05), indicating no publication bias. The Bivariate Box plot indicated no evident heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The GeneXpert enterovirus assay demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing enterovirus meningitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Enteroviral meningitis (n=1,890). GeneXpert EV assay vs. RT-PCR was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (Diagnostic Odds Ratio) (DOR 3648.23, 95% CI 963.99-13806.72). The GeneXpert EV assay demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for enteroviral meningitis, yielding a pooled sensitivity of 0.96, a pooled specificity of 0.99, and a diagnostic odds ratio of 3648.23.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: