Key result
Losartan significantly decreased 24-hour proteinuria by 50.4% (95% CI -58.9 to -40.2%) after 20 weeks compared to no significant change with amlodipine (P<0.001) in non-diabetic nephropathies.
Why the study?
Does losartan reduce 24 h proteinuria compared to amlodipine in patients with non-diabetic nephropathies?
RCT (n=97)
Double-blind
randomly assigned
Does losartan reduce 24 h proteinuria compared to amlodipine in patients with non-diabetic nephropathies?
Losartan significantly reduces proteinuria and urinary TGF-beta excretion compared to amlodipine in patients with non-diabetic proteinuric renal diseases.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preferring losartan over amlodipine for proteinuria reduction in non-diabetic nephropathies; extends ARB renoprotective evidence beyond diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Proteinuria is a significant independent determinant of the progression of chronic renal diseases. It induces an increased synthesis of angiotensin II, endothelin and profibrogenic growth factors, such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), by mesangial and tubular cells. The antiproteinuric effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathies predicts long-term renoprotection afforded by these drugs. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists are renoprotective in patients with type 2 diabetes, but studies about their effect in non-diabetic proteinuric nephropathies are very scarce. METHODS: We randomly assigned 97 patients with non-diabetic nephropathies and proteinuria >1.5 g/24 h to treatment with losartan (50 mg daily) or amlodipine (5 mg daily) for 20 weeks. Doses of the study medications were titrated to achieve a target blood pressure <140/90 mmHg in both groups. Primary outcome was the decrease in the level of 24 h proteinuria. Secondary outcomes were changes in the plasma and urinary levels of TGF-beta. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics in both groups were similar. Proteinuria decreased by 32.4% (95% confidence interval -38.4 to -21.8%) after 4 weeks of treatment and by 50.4% (-58.9 to -40.2%) after 20 weeks in the losartan group, whereas no significant proteinuria changes were observed in the amlodipine group (P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between the level of baseline proteinuria and the proteinuria decrease induced by losartan. Both losartan and amlodipine induced a similar and significant blood pressure reduction. Target blood pressure was achieved with the initial dose of study medication (50 mg daily) in 76% of losartan group patients and in 68% of the amlodipine group patients (5 mg daily). Urinary TGF-beta significantly decreased with losartan (-22.4% of the baseline values after 20 weeks of treatment), whereas it tended to increase with amlodipine (between-group difference P < 0.05). A significant correlation between proteinuria decrease and urinary TGF-beta reduction was found in the losartan group (r = 0.41, P < 0.005). Serum creatinine and serum potassium remained stable during the study in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan induced a drastic decrease in proteinuria accompanied by a reduction in urinary excretion of TGF-beta in patients with non-diabetic proteinuric renal diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manuel Praga (2003) conducted an RCT in non-diabetic proteinuric renal diseases (n=97). losartan vs. amlodipine (5 mg daily) was evaluated on decrease in the level of 24 h proteinuria (95% CI -58.9 to -40.2, p=< 0.001). Losartan significantly decreased 24-hour proteinuria by 50.4% (95% CI -58.9 to -40.2%) after 20 weeks compared to no significant change with amlodipine (P<0.001) in non-diabetic nephropathies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: