Key result
Cervical spinal cord injury was associated with a 66% increase in forward MAP to MCAv information transmission compared to uninjured controls (p=0.0003), indicating reduced BP buffering.
Why the study?
The impact of cervical spinal cord injury disrupting descending sympathetic pathways on cerebrovascular buffering of blood pressure and the Cushing-like mechanism was not understood.
Does cervical spinal cord injury alter the directional relationship between blood pressure and cerebral blood flow?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
Does cervical spinal cord injury alter the directional relationship between blood pressure and cerebral blood flow?
Cervical spinal cord injury disrupts the normal bidirectional communication between blood pressure and cerebral blood flow, leading to reduced cerebrovascular buffering of blood pressure.
The capacity of the cerebrovasculature to buffer changes in blood pressure (BP) likely plays an important role in the prevention of stroke, which is three- to fourfold more common after spinal cord injury (SCI). Although the directional relationship between BP and cerebral blood flow (CBF) has traditionally been thought to travel solely from BP to CBF, a Cushing-like mechanism functioning in the inverse direction, in which changes in CBF influence BP, has recently been revealed using Granger causality analysis. Although both CBF buffering of BP and the Cushing-like mechanism are influenced by the sympathetic nervous system, we do not understand the impact of disruption of descending sympathetic pathways within the spinal cord, caused by cervical SCI on these regulatory systems. We hypothesized that people with cervical SCI would have greater BP to CBF transmission, as well as a reduced Cushing-like mechanism. The directional relationships between mean arterial BP (MAP; Finometer ® PRO) and middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv; transcranial Doppler) were assessed at rest in 14 cervical SCI subjects and 16 uninjured individuals using Granger causality analysis, while also accounting for end-tidal CO 2 tension. Those with SCI exhibited 66% increased forward MAP→MCAv information transmission as compared with the uninjured group ( p = 0.0003), indicating reduced cerebrovascular buffering of BP, and did not have a predominant backward Cushing-like MCAv→MAP phenotype. These results indicate that both forward and backward communication between BP and CBF are influenced by SCI, which may be associated with impaired cerebrovascular BP buffering after SCI as well as widespread BP instability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saleem et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Cervical spinal cord injury (n=30). Cervical spinal cord injury vs. Uninjured individuals was evaluated on Directional relationships between mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) (66% increase, p=0.0003). Cervical spinal cord injury was associated with a 66% increase in forward MAP to MCAv information transmission compared to uninjured controls (p=0.0003), indicating reduced BP buffering.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: