Why the study?
Does cine magnetic resonance imaging accurately assess the severity of aortic regurgitation compared to color flow Doppler echocardiography?
Does cine magnetic resonance imaging accurately assess the severity of aortic regurgitation compared to color flow Doppler echocardiography?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cine MRI is a reliable, noninvasive tool for evaluating aortic regurgitation that correlates well with color flow Doppler, though Doppler may overestimate severity compared to MRI.
Cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to assess aortic regurgitation (AR) in 13 patients with valvular disease and 3 normal subjects, and the results were compared to color Doppler flow mapping findings. AR produced a signal void in the left ventricle during the diastolic phase in all patients by MRI. There were no false positive or negative results compared with echocardiographic findings. Visual grading of cine MRI gave results similar to color flow Doppler echocardiography (88%). The distance and the area of aortic regurgitation using MRI correlated well with color Doppler flow mapping (r = 0.82 and 0.88). However, measurements of distance and area by color flow Doppler tended to be larger than those by cine MRI. With current techniques echocardiography may overestimate the severity of AR as compared with cine MRI. In addition, MRI gives clinically useful information in patients in whom transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is not adequate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamai et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: