Key result
Topiroxostat protected against ischemia-reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts by preventing left ventricular dysfunction and shortening arrhythmia recovery time, demonstrating higher potency than allopurinol.
Why the study?
Does topiroxostat improve ventricular function and reduce ischemia/reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts compared to allopurinol or NAC?
Does topiroxostat improve ventricular function and reduce ischemia/reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts compared to allopurinol or NAC?
Topiroxostat demonstrates potent cardioprotective effects against ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat model by inhibiting xanthine oxidase and reducing reactive oxygen species generation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet inform clinical cardioprotection strategies; leaves open translation of topiroxostat's potency from rat models to humans.
BACKGROUND: Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury triggers cardiac dysfunctions via creating reactive oxygen species (ROS). Because xanthine oxidase (XO) is one of the major enzymes that generate ROS, inhibition of XO is expected to suppress ROS-induced I/R injury. However, it remains unclear whether XO inhibition really yields cardioprotection during I/R. The protective effects of the XO inhibitors, topiroxostat and allopurinol, on cardiac I/R injury were evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using isolated rat hearts, ventricular functions, occurrence of arrhythmias, XO activities and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) productions and myocardial levels of adenine nucleotides before and after I/R, and cardiomyocyte death markers during reperfusion, were evaluated. Topiroxostat prevented left ventricular dysfunctions and facilitated recovery from arrhythmias during I/R. Allopurinol and the antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), exhibited similar effects at higher concentrations. Topiroxostat inhibited myocardial XO activities and TBARS productions after I/R. I/R decreased myocardial levels of ATP, ADP and AMP, but increased that of xanthine. While topiroxostat, allopurinol or NAC did not change myocardial levels of ATP, ADP or AMP after I/R, all of the agents decreased the level of xanthine. They also decreased releases of CPK and LDH during reperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Topiroxostat showed protective effects against I/R injury with higher potency than allopurinol or NAC. It dramatically inhibited XO activity and TBARS production, suggesting suppression of ROS generation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanno et al. (2018) studied Ischemia-reperfusion injury. Topiroxostat vs. Control (untreated ischemia/reperfusion), allopurinol, and N-acetylcysteine was evaluated on Left ventricular function and recovery time from arrhythmias. Topiroxostat protected against ischemia-reperfusion injury in isolated rat hearts by preventing left ventricular dysfunction and shortening arrhythmia recovery time, demonstrating higher potency than allopurinol.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: