Key result
Absence of hemodynamic improvement on impedance cardiography during levosimendan infusion predicted 1-year mortality with 86% sensitivity and 85% specificity, outperforming echo and BNP criteria.
Why the study?
Does noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation using impedance cardiography predict 1-year mortality in patients with advanced heart failure receiving levosimendan?
Observational (n=40)
Does noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation using impedance cardiography predict 1-year mortality in patients with advanced heart failure receiving levosimendan?
Impedance cardiography provides reliable noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring during levosimendan infusion and strongly predicts 1-year mortality in patients with advanced heart failure.
May support impedance cardiography for risk stratification in advanced HF on levosimendan; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
AIMS: Optimization of inotropic treatment in worsening heart failure sometimes requires invasive hemodynamic assessment in selected patients. Impedance cardiography (ICG) may be useful for a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation. METHODS: ICG was performed in 40 patients (69 ± 8 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 27.5 ± 5.6%; New York Heart Association 3.18 ± 0.34; Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support 5.48 ± 0.96, before and after infusion of Levosimendan (0.1–0.2 µg/kg per min for up to 24 h). Echocardiogram, ICG [measuring cardiac index (CI), total peripheral resistances (TPRs) and thoracic fluid content (TFC)] and plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were obtained; in nine patients, right heart catheterization was also carried out. RESULTS: When right catheterization and ICG were performed simultaneously, a significant relationship was observed between values of CI and TPR, and between TFC and pulmonary wedge pressure. ICG detected the Levosimendan-induced recovery of the hemodynamic status, associated with improved systolic and diastolic function and reduction in BNP levels. One-year mortality was 4.4%. At multivariate analysis, independent predictors of mortality were: no improvement in the severity of mitral regurgitation, a persistent restrictive filling pattern (E/E’ > 15), a reduction of BNP levels below 30% and a change below 10% in CI, TPR and TFC. When combined, absence of hemodynamic improvement at ICG could predict 1-year mortality with better sensitivity (86%) and specificity (85%) than the combination of echocardiographic and BNP criteria only (sensitivity 80% and specificity 36%). CONCLUSION: Noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation of heart failure patients during infusion of inodilator drugs is reliable and may help in their prognostic stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malfatto et al. (2014) conducted an observational in advanced heart failure (n=40). Impedance cardiography (ICG) vs. Echocardiographic and BNP criteria was evaluated on 1-year mortality. Absence of hemodynamic improvement on impedance cardiography during levosimendan infusion predicted 1-year mortality with 86% sensitivity and 85% specificity, outperforming echo and BNP criteria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: