Why the study?
HFHSD-fed mice model metabolic syndrome but show minor endothelial dysfunction in aortas without PVAT, prompting evaluation of whether additional factors like DM, dyslipidemia, and steatohepatitis impair endothelial function.
In a metabolic syndrome mouse model, endothelial dysfunction is initially driven by perivascular adipose tissue, but the addition of diabetes, dyslipidemia, or steatohepatitis leads to intrinsic vascular dysfunction.
Metabolic syndrome (Mets) is the major contributor to the onset of metabolic complications, such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, resulting in cardiovascular diseases. C57BL/6 mice on a high-fat and high-sucrose diet (HFHSD) are a well-established model of Mets but have minor endothelial dysfunction in isolated aortas without perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of additional factors such as DM, dyslipidemia, and steatohepatitis on endothelial dysfunction in aortas without PVAT. Here, we employed eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice fed with a normal diet (ND), HFHSD, steatohepatitis choline-deficient HFHSD (HFHSD-SH), and HFHSD containing 1% cholesterol and 0.1% deoxycholic acid (HFHSD-Chol) for 16 weeks. At week 20, some HFHSD-fed mice were treated with streptozocin to develop diabetes (HFHSD-DM). In PVAT-free aortas, the endothelial-dependent relaxation (EDR) did not differ between ND and HFHSD (p = 0.25), but in aortas with PVAT, the EDR of HFHSD-fed mice was impaired compared with ND-fed mice (p = 0.005). HFHSD-DM, HFHSD-SH, and HFHSD-Chol impaired the EDR in aortas without PVAT (p < 0.001, p = 0.019, and p = 0.009 vs. ND, respectively). Furthermore, tempol rescued the EDR in those models. In the Mets model, the EDR is compromised by PVAT, but with the addition of DM, dyslipidemia, and SH, the vessels themselves may result in impaired EDR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osaki et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: