Why the study?
Does VVI pacing increase the risk of atrial fibrillation and embolic complications in pacemaker patients compared to dual chamber pacing?
Population
246 pacemaker patients with sinus rhythm at implantation
Comparison
VVI pacemaker (n=203) vs Dual chamber pacemaker (n=43)
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 63 +/- 45 months
Authors
Loading...
Higher AF incidence after pacing for sick sinus syndrome supports targeted monitoring; leaves open VVI versus dual-chamber effects on embolism.
Does VVI pacing increase the risk of atrial fibrillation and embolic complications in pacemaker patients compared to dual chamber pacing?
VVI pacing is associated with a high long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with sick sinus syndrome, likely due to retrograde conduction.
Langenfeld et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: