Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate associations between psychosocial work exposure and the presence of biological and imaging biomarkers of cardiovascular disease.
Does psychosocial work exposure affect biomarkers of cardiovascular disease in adults?
Does psychosocial work exposure affect biomarkers of cardiovascular disease in adults?
High psychosocial work strain is associated with adverse cardiovascular biomarker profiles, specifically low HDL cholesterol in women and metabolic syndrome in men.
Associations with select biomarkers in high-strain jobs may signal risk but should not change practice; leaves open causal effects for longitudinal study.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate associations between psychosocial work exposure and the presence of biological and imaging biomarkers of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a sub-cohort of the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS). Psychosocial exposure was evaluated with the job demand-control model, and analysed according to the standard categorization: high strain, active, passive and low strain (reference). Biomarkers (blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, coronary artery calcification (CAC) and metabolic syndrome) were measured, or derived through measurements, from clinical examinations. Gender-specific prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with regression models and adjusted for age, education, smoking, physical activity, general life stress and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: The analyses included 3882 participants (52.5% women). High strain (high demands-low control) was linked to increased PR for low HDL cholesterol in women, adjusted for all covariates (PR 1.76; 95% CI 1.25-2.48). High strain was also related to moderately increased PR for metabolic syndrome in men, after adjustments for all covariates except BMI (PR 1.25; 95% CI 1.02-1.52). In addition, passive work (low demands-low control) was associated with diastolic hypertension in women (fully adjusted: PR 1.29; 95% CI 1.05-1.59). All relationships between psychosocial factors and LDL cholesterol or CAC (both genders), or hypertension (men), were non-significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Söderberg et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: