Key result
Psychosocial job exposure to high strain was non-significantly associated with an increased prevalence of coronary artery calcification score ≥100 in men (PR 1.54), with no association found in women.
Why the study?
The study aimed to examine potential associations between psychosocial job exposures, evaluated with the Job Demand-Control-model, and the presence of coronary artery calcium.
Does psychosocial job exposure increase the risk of coronary artery calcification in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=777)
No
Does psychosocial job exposure increase the risk of coronary artery calcification in adults?
Relative Risk: 1.54 (95% CI 0.88–2.69)
Psychosocial job exposures showed non-significant trends toward increased coronary artery calcification, with potential sex differences (high strain/active in men, passive in women).
PURPOSE: The aim was to examine potential associations between psychosocial job exposures, evaluated with the Job Demand-Control-model, and presence of coronary artery calcium. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study,(SCAPIS)pilot study. Coronary artery calcium was assessed through computed tomography of the coronary arteries and with coronary artery scoring, CACS. Main outcome was CACS ≥100 compared to CACS 0. Job demand and control was analysed according to the standard categorization of the two variables into: high strain, active, passive and low strain (reference). Associations between these variables and CACS were calculated with prevalence ratios (PR) using Cox regression with robust variance, 95% confidence intervals (CI) and adjusted for age, smoking, education, socioeconomic area and metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: In total 777 participants were used in our analyses, for which 20% of the men and 5% of the women had CACS ≥100, respectively. The PR of having CACS ≥100 was non-significantly elevated for men in high strain jobs 1.54 (95% CI 0.88-2.69) and in active jobs 1.67 (95% CI 0.92-3.06), adjusted for covariates. For women there was no association between exposure to high strain and having CACS ≥100 PR 1.02 (95% CI 0.24-4.31). Among women reporting passive job, the PR was non-significantly elevated, 2.40 (95% CI 0.83-6.92), adjusted for covariates. CONCLUSION: The statistical power of the study was limited, but our results suggests the possibility that exposure to a high strain or an active job situation may increase the risk of CACS in men, while in women, it may rather be exposure to passive job.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eriksson et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery calcification (n=777). Psychosocial job exposure (high strain, active, passive) vs. Low strain job was evaluated on Coronary artery calcification score (CACS) ≥100 (PR 1.54, 95% CI 0.88-2.69). Psychosocial job exposure to high strain was non-significantly associated with an increased prevalence of coronary artery calcification score ≥100 in men (PR 1.54), with no association found in women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: