Why the study?
Limited data are available on right and left ventricular structures and functions in acute HFpEF presenting with hypertensive pulmonary edema versus predominant peripheral edema.
Do right and left ventricular structures and functions differ between hypertensive pulmonary edema and predominant peripheral edema phenotypes in patients with acute HFpEF?
Do right and left ventricular structures and functions differ between hypertensive pulmonary edema and predominant peripheral edema phenotypes in patients with acute HFpEF?
In acute HFpEF, the hypertensive pulmonary edema phenotype is associated with distinct echocardiographic features including eccentric LV geometry, smaller RV/RA sizes, and higher RV systolic function compared to the peripheral edema phenotype.
Findings on RV/LV differences in AHF-pEF phenotypes are hypothesis-generating; larger prospective studies needed before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on right (RV) and left (LV) ventricular structures and functions in acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (AHF-pEF) presenting with hypertensive pulmonary edema (APE) versus predominant peripheral edema (peHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective study of consecutive patients with AHF-pEF, 80 patients met inclusion and not exclusion criteria, and underwent echocardiographic and laboratory examination in the emergency ward. The survived (94%) were re-evaluated at the discharge. At admission, systolic, diastolic, pulse blood pressure (BP), and high sensitivity troponin I were higher (all P < 0.05) with APE than with peHF while brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), hemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) did not differ between the two phenotypes. LV volumes and EF were comparable between APE and peHF, but APE showed lower relative wall thickness (RWT), smaller left atrial (LA) volume, higher pulse pressure/stroke volume (PP/SV), and higher ratio between the peak velocities of the early diastolic waves sampled by traditional and tissue Doppler modality (mitral E/e', all P < 0.05). Right ventricular and atrial (RA) areas were smaller, tricuspid anular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and estimated pulmonary artery peak systolic pressure (sPAP) were higher with APE than with peHF (all P < 0.05) while averaged degree of severity of tricuspid insufficiency was greater with peHF than with APE. At discharge, PP/SV, mitral E/e', sPAP, RV sizes were reduced from admission in both phenotypes (all P < 0.05) and did not differ anymore between phenotypes, whereas LV EF and TAPSE did not show significant changes over time and treatments. CONCLUSION: In AHF-pEF, at comparable BNP and LV EF, hypertensive APE showed eccentric LV geometry but smaller RV and RA sizes, and higher RV systolic function, increased LV ventricular filling and systemic arterial loads. AHF resolution abolished the differences in PP/SV and LV diastolic load between APE and peHF whereas APE remained associated with more eccentric RV and higher TAPSE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iacovoni et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: