Why the study?
Does transventricular intracardiac impedance measurement discriminate haemodynamically unstable ventricular arrhythmias in patients undergoing electrophysiological studies?
Does transventricular intracardiac impedance measurement discriminate haemodynamically unstable ventricular arrhythmias in patients undergoing electrophysiological studies?
Transventricular impedance falls significantly during unstable arrhythmias and strongly correlates with pulse pressure, suggesting its potential utility as a sensor for haemodynamic discrimination.
May support impedance sensing for VT discrimination; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
AIMS: To measure changes in transventricular impedance during arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were studied during electrophysiological studies. A quadrapolar catheter was positioned at the right ventricular apex (RVA) and a decapolar catheter within the coronary sinus (CS). Transventricular impedance was measured by injecting a subthreshold biphasic rectangular pulse of 600 micro A between poles 1 of the CS catheter and pole 1 of the RVA catheter and the voltage measured between CS pole 10 and RVA catheter pole 4. Stroke impedance (SZ), surface ECG, intracardiac electrogram (IEGM), and invasive femoral artery blood pressure (FAP) were recorded. Twenty-eight patients were analysed, 5 with inducible, haemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT) (HUSVT), 5 with stable VT (HSVT). During HUSVT, the SZ value reduced to 22% (range 0.15-0.32 P < 0.001) in comparison with sinus rhythm. For HSVT, the SZ value reduced to 58% (range 0.33-0.88) P < 0.01, significantly different from HUSVT (P < 0.01). There was a good correlation between reduction of SZ and arterial pulse pressure (PP) during arrhythmias (r = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Changes in SZ strongly correlated with PP amplitude. Transventricular impedance fell significantly during unstable arrhythmias and may be useful as a sensor capable of haemodynamic discrimination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaye et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: