Why the study?
Does N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) suppress ventricular extrasystoles with similar potency to procainamide?
Does N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) suppress ventricular extrasystoles with similar potency to procainamide?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
N-acetylprocainamide is nearly equipotent to procainamide in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias, suggesting that clinical dosing regimens should account for NAPA plasma levels.
Compared to procainamide in an animal arrhythmic model, the antiarrhythmic potency of the N-acetylated metabolite of procainamide (NAPA) was 92% with respect to dose and 70% with respect to plasma level. The antiarrhythmic effects of combinations of the drugs were additive. Measurements of procainamide and NAPA plasma levels needed to suppress ventricular extrasystoles suggested that both compounds are nearly equipotent in patients as well. The average plasma level required for arrhythmia control in these patients was equivalent to 5.1 mcg/ml procainamide. Since patients on long-term procainamide therapy have plasma concentrations of NAPA that are usually comparable to, and occasionally greater than, their procainamide levels, dose regiments based on procainamide levels alone need revision to include consideration of the levels of this metabolite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ELSON et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: