Key result
Myofibril stiffness during shortening was greater than during stretching and depended on speed (1234 nN/μm at 0.4 μm/s; 1106 nN/μm at 0.8 μm/s), suggesting nonlinear viscoelastic properties.
Skeletal muscle myofibrils exhibit nonlinear viscoelastic properties during stretching and shortening in a rigor state.
May inform models of cardiac relaxation; leaves open sarcomere contributions to diastolic dysfunction.
In this study, we measured the stiffness of skeletal muscle myofibrils in rigor. Using a custom-built atomic force microscope, myofibrils were first placed in a rigor state then stretched and shortened at different displacements (0.1-0.3 μm per sarcomere) and nominal speeds (0.4 and 0.8 μm/s). During stretching, the myofibril stiffness was independent of both displacement and speed (average of 987 nN/μm). During shortening, the myofibril stiffness was independent of displacement, but dependent on speed (1234 nN/μm at 0.4 μm/s; 1106 nN/μm at 0.8 μm/s). Furthermore, the myofibril stiffness during shortening was greater than that during stretching and the difference depended on speed (31% at 0.4 μm/s; 8% at 0.8 μm/s). The results suggest that the myofibrils exhibit nonlinear viscoelastic properties that may be derived from myofibril filaments, similar to what has been observed in muscle fibers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shalabi et al. (2017) studied Skeletal muscle myofibrils in rigor. Stretching and shortening at different displacements and speeds was evaluated on Myofibril stiffness. Myofibril stiffness during shortening was greater than during stretching and depended on speed (1234 nN/μm at 0.4 μm/s; 1106 nN/μm at 0.8 μm/s), suggesting nonlinear viscoelastic properties.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: