Key result
In 3 patients undergoing neurosurgery, tonometric blood pressure recording failed to consistently detect relevant long-term pressure variations compared to invasive monitoring over 5.7 hours.
Why the study?
Does non-invasive arterial tonometry accurately reflect invasive blood pressure monitoring during neurosurgical interventions?
Observational (n=3)
Does non-invasive arterial tonometry accurately reflect invasive blood pressure monitoring during neurosurgical interventions?
Arterial tonometry is currently insufficiently reliable for long-term non-invasive blood pressure monitoring during delicate operative procedures.
Tonometry may miss BP variations in neurosurgery; leaves open need for larger validation before any clinical adoption.
Arterial tonometry is a non-invasive technique for continuous registration of arterial pressure waveforms. This study aims to assess tonometric blood pressure recording (TBP) as an alternative for invasive long-term bedside monitoring. A prospective study was set up where patients undergoing neurosurgical intervention were subjected to both invasive (IBP) and non-invasive (TBP) blood pressure monitoring during the entire procedure. A single-element tonometric pressure transducer was used to better investigate different inherent error sources of TBP measurement. A total of 5.7 hours of combined IBP and TBP were recorded from three patients. Although TBP performed fairly well as an alternative for IBP in steady state scenarios and some short-term variations, it could not detect relevant long-term pressure variations at all times. These findings are discussed in comparison to existing work. Physiological alterations at the site of TBP measurement are highlighted as a potentially important source of artifacts. It is concluded that at this point arterial tonometry remains not enough understood for long-term use during a delicate operative procedure. Physiological changes at the TBP measurement site deserve further investigation before tonometry technology is to be considered as an non-invasive alternative for long-term clinical monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthys et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Neurosurgical intervention (n=3). Tonometric blood pressure recording (TBP) vs. Invasive blood pressure monitoring (IBP) was evaluated on Detection of relevant long-term pressure variations. In 3 patients undergoing neurosurgery, tonometric blood pressure recording failed to consistently detect relevant long-term pressure variations compared to invasive monitoring over 5.7 hours.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: