Key result
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using remodelling and external ring annuloplasty in Marfan syndrome patients resulted in 0 mortalities and 2 reoperations over a mean 7.5-year follow-up.
Why the study?
To evaluate operative and mid-term outcomes of a valve-sparing root replacement technique combining remodelling and external aortic ring annuloplasty in patients with Marfan syndrome.
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement combining remodelling and external aortic ring annuloplasty provide safe and durable outcomes in adult patients with Marfan syndrome?
Cohort (n=22)
Yes
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement combining remodelling and external aortic ring annuloplasty provide safe and durable outcomes in adult patients with Marfan syndrome?
Valve-sparing root replacement using remodelling combined with aortic-ring annuloplasty is safe and effective in Marfan syndrome patients, though caution is advised for those with extremely dilated roots (≥65 mm) and severe preoperative regurgitation.
Promising mid-term durability in elective Marfan cases; leaves open questions on use in severely dilated roots with severe regurgitation.
OBJECTIVES: The most recent valve-sparing root replacement technique combines the advantages of the reimplantation (David) and remodelling (Yacoub) techniques. The aortic root is reconstructed according to the remodelling technique, the aortic valve is repaired according to the principle of effective height, and an external ring provides annular support. The purpose of this study was to evaluate operative and mid-term outcomes using this technique in patients with Marfan syndrome. METHODS: Adult patients with Marfan syndrome who had an indication for aortic root surgery according to European Society of Cardiology guidelines and were operated on using this new root replacement technique were retrospectively evaluated. Follow-up was obtained from standard outpatient visits and included echocardiography. RESULTS: The study group comprised 22 patients (mean age 36 years, 68% males). Mean follow-up was 7.5 years. There were no mortalities. Two patients required aortic valve replacement because of aortic regurgitation. In both patients, the aortic root was severely dilated (≥65 mm) preoperatively, with grade III aortic valve regurgitation and aortic valve cusps that were very fragile. Aortic regurgitation was grade ≤I on follow-up in 18 of the remaining 20 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Valve-sparing root replacement using remodelling combined with aortic-ring annuloplasty is safe in patients with Marfan syndrome. The mid-term outcome is promising in patients undergoing elective valve-sparing root replacement at recommended root diameters. However, in patients with extremely dilated aortic roots and already severe aortic regurgitation, the technique should be used cautiously as aortic cusps are fragile and might not be suitable for durable repair. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMCG Research registry #11208.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Accord et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Marfan syndrome with indication for aortic root surgery (n=22). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using remodelling combined with external aortic ring annuloplasty was evaluated on Mortality. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using remodelling and external ring annuloplasty in Marfan syndrome patients resulted in 0 mortalities and 2 reoperations over a mean 7.5-year follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: